{"id":5957,"date":"2014-12-29T21:21:00","date_gmt":"2014-12-30T04:21:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/myfutureamerica.org\/?p=5957"},"modified":"2014-12-29T21:23:18","modified_gmt":"2014-12-30T04:23:18","slug":"the-fighter-who-lost-before-being-flown-a-danger-for-israel","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/myfutureamerica.org\/?p=5957","title":{"rendered":"The fighter who lost before being flown &#8211; A Danger for Israel."},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"content col-xs-9\">\n<div class=\"field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden\">\n<div class=\"field-items\">\n<div class=\"field-item even\">\n<div>\n<p><em><a href=\"http:\/\/in.rbth.com\/blogs\/2014\/10\/12\/why_the_f-35_is_a_sitting_duck_for_the_flankers_38959.html\">This article <\/a>is an excellent read to understand how Russia&#8217;s technological level is best in its class in many military sectors, especially with regard to fighter jets. \u00a0<strong>It originally appeared in Russia &amp; India Report.<\/strong> The SU-30 continues to be the number one choice among global buyers.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Built to be the deadliest hunter killer aircraft of all time, the F-35 has quite literally become the hunted. In every scenario that the F-35 has been wargamed against Su-30 Flankers, the Russian aircraft have emerged winners. America\u2019s newest stealth aircraft \u2013 costing $191 million per unit \u2013 is riddled with such critical design flaws that it\u2019s likely to get blown away in a shootout with the super-maneuverable Sukhois.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p>Stubby wings (that reduce lift and maneuverability), a bulbous fuselage (that makes it less aerodynamic) low speed and a super hot engine (which a half decent radar can identify) are just a few of the major flaws that will expose its vulnerability during air combat.<\/p>\n<p>With more than 600 Flankers (Sukhoi-27s and its later iterations such as the Su-30, Su-34 and Su-35 Super Flanker) flying with air forces around the world, the fate of the fifth generation F-35 seems decidedly uncertain. Aerospace experts across the world are veering around to the view that America\u2019s most expensive fighter development program (pegged at $1.5 trillion) will be a sitting duck for the flankers.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s a turkey,\u201d declares aerospace engineer Pierre Sprey in\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=TS7O14nzrzE\" target=\"_blank\">an interview to Dutch television<\/a>.\u00a0Few people are as qualified to speak about fighter aircraft as Sprey. He is the co-designer of the F-16 Falcon jet and the A-10 Warthog tank buster, two of the most successful aircraft in the US Air Force (USAF).<\/p>\n<p>Winslow T. Wheeler, Director of the US\u2019 Straus Military Reform Project, Centre for Defense information, agrees. \u201cThe F-35 is too heavy and sluggish to be successful as a fighter,\u201d he says. \u201cIf we ever face an enemy with a serious air force we will be in deep trouble.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>So far the US has been lucky it has never really encountered a \u201cserious\u201d military. Over the skies of war-weary Iraq, tiny Libya and utterly defenseless Afghanistan, the American aircraft operated with impunity. But luck can run out \u2013 if they ever come up against the air forces of Russia, China or India the outcome won\u2019t be so one-sided. In particular, the Indian Air Force has beaten the USAF\u2019s fourth generation fighters using both third and fourth generation jets.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"views-row views-row-5 views-row-odd views-row-last\">\n<div class=\"clear\">\n<div class=\"with-subtitle\">\n<h1 id=\"page-title\" class=\"title\">The Latest Russian Fighter Jet Blows America&#8217;s Away<\/h1>\n<div class=\"sub-title\">Outgunned by the Su-30 family of aircraft and suffering critical design flaws, the American F-35 is staring down the barrel of obsolescence \u2013 and punching a gaping hole in western air defences.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<aside class=\"col-x-3\">\n<div id=\"block-block-19\" class=\"block block-block even\">\n<p class=\"ads\"><ins class=\"adsbygoogle\" data-adsbygoogle-status=\"done\" data-ad-client=\"ca-pub-4805444160379559\" data-ad-slot=\"3291287425\"><ins id=\"aswift_1_expand\"><ins id=\"aswift_1_anchor\">\u00a0<\/ins><\/ins><\/ins><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/aside>\n<div class=\"clear\">\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/myfutureamerica.org\/?attachment_id=5959\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-5959\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-5959\" src=\"https:\/\/myfutureamerica.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/asdgasd.jpg\" alt=\"asdgasd\" width=\"300\" height=\"155\" srcset=\"https:\/\/myfutureamerica.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/asdgasd.jpg 300w, https:\/\/myfutureamerica.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/asdgasd-200x103.jpg 200w, https:\/\/myfutureamerica.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/asdgasd-298x154.jpg 298w, https:\/\/myfutureamerica.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/asdgasd-120x62.jpg 120w, https:\/\/myfutureamerica.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/asdgasd-150x78.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/div>\n<p class=\"parallax\"><span class=\"embedded-node embedded-image hidden-print\"> <span class=\"parallax-wrap\"> <span class=\"image-info\"> <span class=\"inner-wrap\"> <span class=\"image-caption\">Su-35<\/span> <\/span> <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<div class=\"clear\"><\/div>\n<aside>\n<div id=\"block-views-nodeid-block-5\" class=\"block block-views first odd\"><\/div>\n<\/aside>\n<div class=\"content\">\n<div>\n<p>The biggest problem with the F-35 is that its US designers are betting on stealth and long range radar to compensate for its lack of speed and maneuverability. But stealth is not really all that it is cracked up to be; it is not the cloak of invisibility.<\/p>\n<p>Plus, Russia\u2019s already excellent radars are getting better. Says Defense Industry Daily (DID): \u201cMeanwhile, key radar advances are already deployed in the most advanced Russian surface-to-air missile systems, and existing IRST (infra-red scan and track) systems deployed on advanced Russian and European fighters are extending enemy detection ranges against radar-stealthy aircraft. Fighter radar pick-up capability of up to (46km) by 2020 is proposed against even ultra-stealthy aircraft like the F-22, coupled with IRST ability to identify Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missile firings and less infrared-stealthy aircraft at (92km) or more.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>At the same time, there is no such thing as one radar in a war. \u201cThere are lots of radars,\u201d Sprey explains. \u201cAnd you can\u2019t be nose-on or dead-level to every radar in the theater. There are always going to be radars that are going to be shining up (from below) or looking from above \u2013 they can all see you.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>Short on firepower<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Another issue is with the American aircraft\u2019s overall shape. \u201cMost great airplanes are beautiful because you are trying to reduce drag,\u201d Sprey says. \u201cBut here because of stealth they had to make it very bulbous, very big as they had to carry the weapons inside because as soon as you carry the weapons outside they reflect radar. So this is a huge penalty to the performance of the aircraft which is now big and lumbering like a bomber.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Lower internal payload means the designers at Lockheed-Martin have signed the F-35\u2019s death warrant. The aircraft carries just two large bombs and four small ones, and a maximum of four beyond visual range (BVR) air-to-air missiles (AAMs).<\/p>\n<p>The USAF claims the F-35\u2019s advanced radar will see the enemy aircraft first and be able to take it out with one of its four long-range AAMs. But BVR kills are still the stuff of dreams for fighter pilots and are quite rare.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, the reliance on the radar acquisition and AAMS can prove suicidal \u2013 as indeed it was once upon a time. During the Vietnam War the USAF was so smitten with the concept of BVR combat that the first F-4 fighters were armed only with missiles. But after the Vietnamese Air Force pilots shot them down by the bucket load, the Americans reintroduced cannons in the F-4.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, Russia, which has the most advanced and varied range of BVR missiles in the world, arms its Flankers with at least eight missiles for the simple reason that it takes several shots at a fast moving target to score a kill.<\/p>\n<p>That the Americans ignored this basic lesson of air combat is mind boggling.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"clear\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"parallax\"><span class=\"embedded-node embedded-image hidden-print\"> <span class=\"parallax-wrap\"> <span class=\"image-info\"> <span class=\"inner-wrap\"> <span class=\"image-caption\">su-30mk<\/span> <\/span> <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/div>\n<div class=\"clear\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"content\">\n<p>In theory, American pilots would play \u2018video games\u2019 and take out enemy aircraft at 1000 km. In practice, air combat is like a knife fight. According to DID, the F-35 is very likely to wind up facing many more \u201cup close and personal\u201d opponents than its proponents suggest, while dealing with effective BVR infrared-guided missiles as an added complication. Unlike the F-22, the F-35 is described as \u201cdouble inferior\u201d to modern Su-30 family fighters within visual range combat.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The much larger and varied inventory of missiles combined with super-maneuverability, therefore, bestows the Flankers with an edge that\u2019s unparalleled in modern air combat.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Fleet availability<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>According to the new philosophy of air combat that is being defined by USAF-Lockheed-Martin careerists, the one-size-fits-all F-35 will replace all other fighters as well as ground support aircraft.<\/p>\n<p>But here\u2019s the rub. Because the F-35 is such an expensive aircraft, air forces will buy fewer units. For instance, Japan currently has 100 F-15s but it will replace them with just 70 F-35s. Again, because the F-35 will also be expensive to fly and maintain, air forces will limit pilot flying hours. (Already, spending cuts have forced the USAF to eliminate more than 44,000 flying hours and\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.defensenews.com\/article\/20130408\/DEFREG02\/304080011\/Reduced-Flying-Hours-Forces-USAF-Ground-17-Combat-Air-Squadrons\" target=\"_blank\">ground 17 combat air squadrons<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p>Besides, \u2018stealth\u2019 comes with a price. On the F-35 most of the maintenance is on the stealth coating. \u201cIt is a ludicrous impediment to combat,\u201d Sprey says. \u201cYou are sitting on the ground for 50 hours fiddling on the aircraft trying to make it stealthy when it\u2019s not stealthy anyhow.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Plus, 100 per cent fleet availability is a logistical impossibility. The USAF averages around 75 per cent \u2013 which is pretty decent \u2013 but when it comes to stealth aircraft the figures nosedive. The USAF\u2019s\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.airforcetimes.com\/article\/20131002\/NEWS04\/310020026\/Readiness-declines-aging-overworked-fleet\" target=\"_blank\">super-secret B2A stealth bomber<\/a>has an availability rate of just 46.7 per cent. And America\u2019s most expensive fighter, the F-22, despite its $350 million price tag has a fleet availability rate of only 69 per cent.<\/p>\n<p>So if you are, say, the Australian air force, just 48 of your planned fleet of 70 F-35s will be battle ready at any given time. Your chances against the Chinese who have 400 Flankers are smaller than small. You can bet the Aussies won\u2019t be joining the knife fight unless escorted by big brother USA.<\/p>\n<p>Wheeler, who has dealt with US national security issues for over three decades, lays out the implications for western air forces planning to induct the F-35: \u201cThe pilots will get worse as they\u2019ll get much less training, which is most important than any technical issue. There\u2019ll be far fewer pilots as the whole force will have to shrink, and you will basically have a showpiece aircraft that can\u2019t do anything. It\u2019s useless, it\u2019s truly monumentally useless, it will ruin any air force that uses it.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The dogfight hasn\u2019t yet started and the Flankers are up 1-0.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This article is an excellent read to understand how Russia&#8217;s technological level is best in its class in many military sectors, especially with regard to fighter jets. \u00a0It originally appeared in Russia &amp; India Report. The SU-30 continues to be the number one choice among global buyers. Built to be the deadliest hunter killer aircraft [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5958,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[104,105],"tags":[1126,1127],"class_list":["post-5957","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-featured","category-videos","tag-f35","tag-su35"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/myfutureamerica.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/12\/thfdg.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2SfUR-1y5","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/myfutureamerica.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5957","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/myfutureamerica.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/myfutureamerica.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/myfutureamerica.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/myfutureamerica.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5957"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/myfutureamerica.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5957\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5962,"href":"https:\/\/myfutureamerica.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5957\/revisions\/5962"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/myfutureamerica.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/5958"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/myfutureamerica.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5957"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/myfutureamerica.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5957"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/myfutureamerica.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5957"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}